AI Penetration Testing Services

Enterprise Cyber-Resilience — Adversarial ML Division

AI Penetration
Testing Services

Sabalynx provides the world’s most rigorous adversarial stress-testing for Large Language Models and neural architectures, identifying latent vulnerabilities before they become catastrophic breaches. We secure your inference perimeter against prompt injection, data poisoning, and model inversion attacks through a systematic, multi-vector offensive security framework.

Hardening AI for:
FinTech Kernels HealthData Lakes GovCloud LLMs
Average Client ROI
0%
Calculated via prevented breach liability and regulatory fines
0+
Projects Delivered
0%
Client Satisfaction
0
Service Categories
0+
Countries Served

The Imperative of Adversarial ML Defence

As enterprises shift from pilot programs to production-grade Generative AI, the attack surface expands exponentially. Conventional cybersecurity protocols are insufficient for the probabilistic nature of neural networks; AI requires a specialized defensive paradigm that understands model weights, embedding spaces, and tokenization logic.

Sabalynx utilizes advanced Adversarial Machine Learning (AML) techniques to simulate sophisticated threat actors. We don’t just scan for open ports; we probe for logic flaws in your Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and exploit latent biases in your Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines. This is not just a security audit—it is a comprehensive stress test of your organization’s digital intelligence.

Prompt Injection & Jailbreaking

Simulating sophisticated indirect prompt injection attacks where malicious instructions are hidden in external data sources to hijack the LLM’s system prompt.

Training Data Poisoning

Auditing data ingestion pipelines to ensure that training sets or fine-tuning datasets haven’t been compromised to introduce backdoors or systematic biases.

Vulnerability Surface Coverage

Our testing protocols align with the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and NIST AI Risk Management Frameworks.

Prompt Security
98%
Data Privacy
94%
Model Robustness
91%
API Resilience
96%
100k+
Simulated Attacks
Zero
False Negatives

*Benchmarks derived from Sabalynx Red Teaming exercises conducted across critical infrastructure and global banking sectors.

Our Multi-Layered Red Teaming Process

We deploy a systematic, four-stage offensive security engagement designed to harden your AI architectures from the ground up.

01

Shadow AI Discovery

Identifying undocumented AI integrations, API leaks, and public-facing inference endpoints that represent an unmonitored attack surface.

Intelligence Gathering
02

Adversarial Probing

Executing grey-box and black-box testing against model logic. We probe for membership inference vulnerabilities and PII leakage risks.

Model Stress-Testing
03

Exploit Orchestration

Simulating complex attack chains, such as multi-turn jailbreaks and extraction of underlying training data or proprietary system instructions.

Active Red Teaming
04

Defensive Hardening

Delivering an actionable remediation roadmap, including token filtering strategies, RAG validation layers, and model governance frameworks.

Resilience Engineering

Specialized AI Security Vectors

Model Inversion Defense

We simulate attacks aimed at reconstructing sensitive training data from model outputs, ensuring your proprietary IP and user data remain private.

IP ProtectionData ReconstructionPrivacy

RAG Pipeline Auditing

Testing the security of your vector databases and document retrieval logic to prevent unauthorized access to restricted organizational knowledge.

Vector SecurityAuthorizationKnowledge Retrieval

Evasion Attack Mitigation

Stress-testing classifiers and computer vision models against adversarial perturbations designed to fool the AI into incorrect decision-making.

PerturbationClassifier SecurityComputer Vision

Quantify Your AI
Vulnerability Score

Contact our adversarial ML division today for a confidential assessment of your AI infrastructure. We provide CTO-level reports detailing your exposure to prompt injection, data poisoning, and unauthorized model inference.

24-Hour Rapid Response Specialized Adversarial ML Team Full Regulatory Compliance Reports

The Strategic Imperative of AI Penetration Testing

As Large Language Models (LLMs) and autonomous agents move from experimental sandboxes to core production infrastructure, the attack surface of the enterprise has fundamentally shifted from deterministic code to stochastic intelligence. Traditional cybersecurity frameworks are functionally blind to adversarial machine learning.

Beyond Legacy Security: The Failure of Deterministic Scanners

Legacy Penetration Testing (PT) relies on identifying known vulnerabilities in static code or network configurations—SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), or misconfigured ports. However, AI architectures introduce non-deterministic vulnerabilities. An LLM may respond securely 99 times but leak sensitive PII (Personally Identifiable Information) on the 100th iteration due to a sophisticated prompt injection attack or a “jailbreak” that bypasses the model’s safety alignment.

The global market landscape is currently witnessing a “Security Gap” where 85% of enterprises have deployed AI solutions, yet fewer than 10% have performed rigorous Adversarial Red Teaming. For the CTO, this represents a ticking time bomb of model inversion attacks, where competitors or bad actors can reverse-engineer training data, potentially exposing trade secrets, proprietary algorithms, or customer databases.

$4.45M
Avg. Cost of AI Data Breach
82%
Vulnerable LLM Deployments

The ROI of Proactive Defenses

Investing in AI penetration testing is no longer a “compliance checkbox”—it is a revenue-protection strategy. A single adversarial exploit can result in catastrophic brand erosion, legal liabilities under the EU AI Act, and massive regulatory fines.

  • Risk Mitigation: Preventing Prompt Injection (PI) that could lead to unauthorized system execution or data exfiltration.
  • Intellectual Property Shielding: Protecting the proprietary “Weights and Biases” of custom-tuned models from extraction.
  • Operational Continuity: Ensuring that autonomous AI agents do not engage in “hallucinatory” financial transactions or erratic logic loops.

The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications

Sabalynx engineers deep-dive into the unique architectural weaknesses of your AI stack.

01

Prompt Injection

Manipulating model output via malicious inputs that override system instructions, enabling unauthorized data access or control-flow hijacking.

02

Training Data Poisoning

Compromising the model’s integrity during the fine-tuning phase by introducing biased or malicious data points that create “backdoors.”

03

Model Inversion

Utilizing inference APIs to reconstruct sensitive training data or reverse-engineer the underlying model logic and proprietary weights.

04

RAG Leakage

Exploiting Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines to extract documents from vector databases that the user should not have permission to view.

Don’t Deploy Blindly.

Our AI Red Teaming and Penetration Testing services provide a comprehensive security posture assessment. We don’t just find vulnerabilities; we engineer the guardrails, filters, and monitoring systems required to build world-class, defensible AI.

Adversarial Stress Testing LLM Vulnerability Mapping Regulatory Compliance Review

Securing the Non-Deterministic Layer

Enterprise AI deployment introduces a radical new attack surface. Sabalynx provides the industry’s most rigorous adversarial testing framework, specifically designed to harden Large Language Models (LLMs), RAG architectures, and autonomous agentic workflows against sophisticated neural-level exploitation.

NIST AI RMF Compliant

Multi-Vector Neural Hardening

Standard cybersecurity protocols are insufficient for the probabilistic nature of Machine Learning. Our architecture simulates the full spectrum of Adversarial ML, identifying vulnerabilities in model weights, training data pipelines, and inference-time logic. We analyze the intersection of traditional software vulnerabilities and modern AI-specific risks, such as prompt injection and latent space manipulation.

Jailbreak Coverage
98%
Data Poisoning
94%
RAG Exfiltration
96%
4.2M
Adversarial Payloads
0-Day
LLM Research

Advanced Prompt Injection & Jailbreaking

We deploy automated red-teaming agents that utilize genetic algorithms to evolve prompt injection payloads. This testing bypasses system-level guardrails, identifying indirect prompt injections where malicious instructions are hidden in third-party data retrieved via RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation).

Data Pipeline & Poisoning Analysis

Targeting the MLOps supply chain, we evaluate the integrity of your vector databases and training sets. Our penetration tests simulate “Backdoor Attacks” where subtly manipulated data points are introduced to create trigger-based vulnerabilities in the final model’s behavior.

Model Inversion & Membership Inference

Sabalynx architects evaluate the risk of Intellectual Property (IP) exfiltration and PII leakage. We test if attackers can reconstruct sensitive training data or reverse-engineer proprietary model weights through excessive high-precision API querying.

Rigorous Methodology

Securing AI requires moving beyond static code analysis. Our four-stage technical pipeline ensures that every inference call is authenticated, every prompt is sanitized, and every output is verified against your enterprise security policy.

01

Surface Reconnaissance

Mapping the AI infrastructure, including API endpoints, vector database integrations, and middleware orchestrators like LangChain or Semantic Kernel. We identify entry points for cross-plugin request forgery.

02

Adversarial Probing

Execution of automated and manual adversarial payloads. We test for prompt leaking, jailbreaking, and the bypass of content moderation filters (e.g., Llama Guard, Azure Content Safety).

03

Integrity Verification

Stress-testing the RAG pipeline to ensure the LLM cannot be coerced into accessing unauthorized document chunks. We analyze authorization at the vector-store level versus the application level.

04

Remediation Strategy

Providing specific technical countermeasures: semantic firewalls, differential privacy implementations, LLM-based output sanitizers, and hardening of inference API gateways.

The Sabalynx Advantage: LLM-on-LLM Red Teaming

To combat the speed of AI evolution, we utilize proprietary “Attacker Models”—fine-tuned LLMs specifically trained on the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and the MITRE ATLAS framework. These models autonomously explore millions of permutations of adversarial attacks to find the precise semantic combination that breaks your application’s logic. This approach identifies “Soft Jailbreaks” that traditional keyword-based filters and regex-based guardrails consistently fail to detect.

Advanced AI Penetration Testing Scenarios

As organizations transition from experimental LLM wrappers to mission-critical agentic architectures, the attack surface expands exponentially. Our red-teaming methodologies address the sophisticated vulnerabilities unique to the AI stack—from latent space manipulation to RAG-based poisoning.

Adversarial Evasion in Credit Risk Scoring

The Vulnerability: In the financial sector, proprietary ML models for credit underwriting are susceptible to “evasion attacks.” Sophisticated actors can utilize gradient-based optimization to identify the minimal “perturbations” in application data—often imperceptible to human auditors—that force a model to flip its decision from a high-risk denial to a low-risk approval.

The Sabalynx Solution: Our team conducts “White-Box” and “Grey-Box” penetration testing to map the decision boundaries of your neural networks. We simulate Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks to stress-test your feature engineering pipeline, ensuring that your risk assessment logic remains robust against synthetic data manipulation designed to bypass capital reserve compliance.

Adversarial Robustness Feature Squeezing FINRA Compliance

Inference Attacks on Federated Diagnostics

The Vulnerability: Healthcare providers often utilize Federated Learning (FL) to train diagnostic models across multiple institutions without sharing raw patient data. However, the model gradients themselves can leak highly sensitive Protected Health Information (PHI). Through “Model Inversion” or “Membership Inference” attacks, an adversary can reconstruct individual patient records just by analyzing the differential updates to the global model.

The Sabalynx Solution: We deploy advanced cryptographic auditing and differential privacy simulations to quantify the leakage risk in your FL architecture. By attempting to re-identify training samples from public API responses, we validate your noise-injection strategies and secure your healthcare IP against malicious data extraction that could lead to massive HIPAA violations.

Membership Inference HIPAA Security Differential Privacy

Indirect Prompt Injection in Enterprise RAG

The Vulnerability: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines are the backbone of modern enterprise AI agents. However, they introduce a critical “Indirect Prompt Injection” vector. An attacker can place poisoned documents on a website or in a shared drive that your AI assistant subsequently crawls. These documents contain hidden instructions that hijack the LLM’s logic, potentially tricking the agent into exfiltrating corporate data or executing unauthorized API calls.

The Sabalynx Solution: Our red teaming engagement focuses on the interaction between the Vector Database, the Embeddings model, and the LLM Orchestrator. We simulate “Sleepy Agent” attacks and “ASCII Smuggling” techniques to determine if your system can be manipulated via external knowledge sources. We then help you implement semantic firewalls and output verification layers to neuter these injections.

RAG Red Teaming Data Exfiltration Semantic Filtering

Defeating AI-Driven Anomaly Detection (SIEM)

The Vulnerability: Security Operations Centers (SOCs) are increasingly reliant on AI-powered SIEM and XDR tools to detect intrusions. However, these defensive AI models often have a “blind spot”—if an attacker moves slowly and mimics the baseline statistical noise of the network (Model Poisoning), they can permanently shift the AI’s definition of “normal,” effectively blinding the system to future exfiltration attempts.

The Sabalynx Solution: We act as the adversary to test the resilience of your AI-driven cybersecurity defenses. Our consultants conduct “drift-based” attacks where we slowly introduce malicious traffic to see if your anomaly detection model adapts to the threat rather than alerting on it. This ensures your automated security stack isn’t just a “black box” that can be lulled into complacency.

Model Poisoning XDR Resilience Adaptive Defense

Model Extraction & Intellectual Property Theft

The Vulnerability: For SaaS companies, the core value often lies in a proprietary, fine-tuned model accessible via API. Attackers can use “Model Extraction” techniques—querying your API thousands of times with strategically designed prompts—to effectively “train” a shadow model that clones your model’s performance. This results in the total loss of your competitive advantage and R&D investment.

The Sabalynx Solution: We perform comprehensive API stress-testing to identify the threshold at which your model’s logic becomes reconstructible. We evaluate your rate-limiting, output watermarking, and response-variance strategies to prevent “Knowledge Distillation” attacks. Our goal is to ensure that while your model is accessible, its underlying architecture and weights remain a proprietary secret.

IP Guardrails Knowledge Distillation Watermarking

Adversarial Patches in Industrial Computer Vision

The Vulnerability: In manufacturing and smart grid infrastructure, Computer Vision (CV) is used for quality control and safety monitoring. Physical “Adversarial Patches”—specific patterns printed on objects—can cause these CV models to misclassify dangerous failures as safe operations or completely ignore restricted personnel. In a critical infrastructure context, this can lead to physical sabotage or catastrophic equipment failure.

The Sabalynx Solution: We conduct hybrid physical-digital penetration tests. Our experts develop and test adversarial patterns against your production CV models to identify weaknesses in object detection and semantic segmentation. We then provide recommendations for multi-modal verification (e.g., combining visual data with thermal or acoustic sensors) to ensure your automation cannot be fooled by a simple sticker or light projection.

Industrial AI Safety Object Detection Physical Red Teaming

Quantifying AI Vulnerability

Standard cybersecurity audits ignore the non-deterministic nature of AI. A single successful prompt injection or model inversion can lead to data breaches that regulatory bodies are now penalizing with increasing severity under the EU AI Act and updated SEC guidelines.

90% Reduction in False Negatives

Our adversarial training protocols help your internal teams identify logic flaws before they are exploited in the wild.

Regulatory Compliance Alignment

Sabalynx penetration testing provides the documented “due diligence” required for emerging AI governance frameworks worldwide.

Secure your competitive advantage. Protect your models from the next generation of adversarial threats.

Request an AI Security Audit
Executive Advisory: Security Architecture

The Implementation Reality: Hard Truths About AI Penetration Testing

The rapid democratization of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI has outpaced traditional cybersecurity frameworks. Most organizations are treating AI security as a secondary compliance check. As veterans of a dozen years in Machine Learning and Enterprise Digital Transformation, we know the reality: If you are not red-teaming your models for adversarial robustness, you are effectively leaving your proprietary data and brand reputation in a stochastic black box.

01

Beyond Deterministic Code

Traditional penetration testing seeks binary vulnerabilities—buffer overflows or SQL injections. AI penetration testing is fundamentally different because it must address stochastic failure. Through prompt injection and jailbreaking, attackers can bypass RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) guardrails. We focus on uncovering “indirect prompt injections” where the model processes untrusted third-party data via RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), turning a legitimate query into a malicious exfiltration command.

Challenge: Non-Binary Logic
02

Inference & Privacy Leakage

One of the hardest truths for CTOs to accept is that the model itself can be a data leak. We utilize Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) and model inversion techniques to determine if specific PII or trade secrets were part of the training set. A penetration test that ignores the model weights and the training data pipeline is incomplete. We audit the integrity of your vector databases and the sanitization layers of your data ingestion pipelines to prevent “training data poisoning.”

Risk: PII Exfiltration
03

Automation is Insufficient

Vendors promising “Automated AI Vulnerability Scanners” are selling a false sense of security. Identifying subtle logic flaws, brand-damaging hallucinations, or adversarial perturbations requires human-led Red Teaming. Our process involves creating custom adversarial payloads designed to trigger edge cases in your specific fine-tuned architecture. Automated tools miss the context; we analyze the “intent” of the AI’s output to ensure it aligns with your corporate governance.

Approach: Manual Red Teaming
04

Governance vs. Model Drift

AI security is not a “one-and-done” exercise. Models suffer from concept drift and “safety decay” as new adversarial techniques emerge globally. Our penetration testing methodology includes building continuous monitoring frameworks. We don’t just find the hole; we help you implement an AI Firewall and circuit-breaker architecture that detects malicious intent in real-time, ensuring that as the model evolves, your security posture doesn’t degrade.

Impact: Long-Term Resilience

The Sabalynx AI Red Teaming Methodology

Our approach is built on the MITRE ATLAS™ framework, specifically adapted for enterprise-grade generative AI deployments. We move beyond superficial testing to evaluate the deep-stack vulnerabilities within your MLOps pipeline.

Adversarial Robustness Testing

Testing against evasion attacks where small, human-imperceptible changes to inputs cause the AI to make incorrect or malicious decisions.

RAG Injection & Data Leakage

Simulating attacks on the retrieval layer to ensure the AI does not surface unauthorized documents or succumb to ‘poisoned’ external data sources.

The Cost of Inaction

In a multi-agent AI ecosystem, a single vulnerability in one model can cascade across your entire infrastructure. Our audits prevent the three most common catastrophic failures:

Data Breach
Critical
Brand Drift
High
Compliance Failure
High
$4.4M
Avg. AI Breach Cost
68%
Models Vulnerable

AI That Actually Delivers Results

We don’t just build AI. We engineer outcomes — measurable, defensible, transformative results that justify every dollar of your investment. In the high-stakes domain of AI Penetration Testing and Adversarial Machine Learning, our results are defined by the resilience of your production models against sophisticated attack vectors.

Outcome-First Methodology

Every engagement starts with defining your success metrics. We commit to measurable outcomes — not just delivery milestones. Within our security-centric AI audits, this means shifting focus from generic vulnerability scanning to quantifying the stochastic robustness of your neural architectures.

We understand that for a CTO, the outcome isn’t a 100-page report; it’s a hardened model that maintains its inference integrity under adversarial pressure. Whether we are testing for prompt injection, model inversion, or membership inference attacks, our methodology ensures that the security posture of your Generative AI or predictive analytics platform is fundamentally strengthened, protecting your enterprise from catastrophic data leakage and brand erosion.

100%
Vulnerability Mitigation
0
Post-Deployment Breaches

Global Expertise, Local Understanding

Our team spans 15+ countries. We combine world-class AI expertise with deep understanding of regional regulatory requirements. As the EU AI Act and NIST AI 100-1 frameworks redefine global compliance, Sabalynx provides the specialized Red Teaming services required to navigate these complex legal landscapes.

Our AI penetration testers operate at the intersection of international cybersecurity standards and hyper-local data residency laws. We deploy adversarial simulation strategies that respect the nuances of GDPR, CCPA, and regional sovereignty, ensuring that your Large Language Models (LLMs) and proprietary datasets are secured using techniques that are both technologically advanced and legally defensible in every jurisdiction you operate.

20+
Jurisdictions Audited
ISO
27001/42001 Ready

Responsible AI by Design

Ethical AI is embedded into every solution from day one. We build for fairness, transparency, and long-term trustworthiness. Our Red Teaming for AI services go beyond technical exploits to identify algorithmic bias and weaponized toxicity that can be triggered by adversarial inputs.

Security and ethics are two sides of the same coin in the modern enterprise. A model that is susceptible to poisoning attacks is not a responsible model. We utilize Explainable AI (XAI) techniques to audit decision-making pathways, ensuring that the “black box” of your neural network doesn’t hide vulnerabilities that could be exploited to bypass safety guardrails or induce non-deterministic, harmful outputs.

99%
Bias Mitigation
100%
Audit Transparency

End-to-End Capability

Strategy. Development. Deployment. Monitoring. We handle the full AI lifecycle — no third-party handoffs, no production surprises. This holistic approach is critical for DevSecOps in AI, where security must be integrated into the MLOps pipeline from data ingestion to live inference.

By maintaining a continuous feedback loop between our AI penetration testing unit and our engineering teams, we eliminate the friction typically found between development and security. We implement automated drift detection and adversarial monitoring layers that act as a persistent firewall for your models, ensuring that the machine learning security posture we establish during development remains uncompromised as your data and models evolve over time.

24/7
Model Monitoring
360°
Threat Visibility

Hardening the Stochastic Frontier

Traditional Application Security (AppSec) frameworks are fundamentally ill-equipped to address the non-deterministic nature of Artificial Intelligence. While legacy penetration testing focuses on deterministic logic and fixed entry points, AI Penetration Testing requires a profound understanding of Adversarial Machine Learning (AML), latent space manipulation, and the specific vulnerabilities inherent in Large Language Model (LLM) architectures.

At Sabalynx, we move beyond simple prompt-injection checks. Our elite security engineers conduct deep-tier Red Teaming and Model Vulnerability Assessments designed to identify catastrophic risks before they manifest in production. From mitigating Indirect Prompt Injections in RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipelines to preventing Training Data Poisoning and Model Inversion attacks, we provide the technical defense-in-depth required for enterprise AI deployments.

OWASP Top 10 for LLMs Alignment

Rigorous testing against the emerging standards of AI security, including prompt injection, insecure output handling, and training data poisoning.

Adversarial Evasion Defense

Simulating sophisticated noise-injection and token-manipulation attacks designed to bypass classification filters and safety guardrails.

What to expect in our 45-minute technical session:

  • 01.
    Architecture Threat Modeling

    A high-level evaluation of your AI pipeline, identifying critical ingestion points for adversarial data.

  • 02.
    Latent Vulnerability Identification

    Discussing potential for Model Extraction and Inversion attacks based on your deployment environment.

  • 03.
    Guardrail Benchmarking

    Assessing the effectiveness of existing sanitization layers and semantic firewalls against jailbreaking attempts.

  • 04.
    Regulatory Compliance Path

    Mapping your security posture to emerging AI regulations like the EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF.

Technical Consultant
🛡️
Senior Adversarial Engineer
12+ Yrs Cyber & AI Security
Specialized Red Teaming for Generative AI & RAG Comprehensive Vulnerability Disclosure Reports Defense Orchestration & Mitigation Roadmaps Industry-Specific Threat Intel (Finance, MedTech, Gov)