AI Tech Stack Guide 

Home /Resources /AI Tech Stack Guide

2025 Edition — Tools, Layers & Honest Verdicts

The Complete
AI Tech Stack Guide

Every layer of a production AI system explained — from raw data infrastructure to live application — with tool recommendations, honest trade-offs, and the exact stacks we deploy across 200+ enterprise projects.

Battle-tested on:
200+ projects AWS / Azure / GCP SMB to Fortune 500
Tools Reviewed
80+
Across 7 stack layers with honest verdicts on each
7
Stack Layers
3
Tier Blueprints
2025
Updated
Free
Always

Trusted by industry leaders worldwide

MedTech Global FinanceFirst Bank RetailGiant Corp Nexus Logistics BuildTech Solutions Horizon Energy LegalEdge Partners AgroTech International CloudSphere Networks InsureAI Group

What Is an AI Tech Stack?

An AI tech stack is the complete collection of tools, platforms, and infrastructure that work together to power an AI system — from raw data at the bottom all the way to the live application your users interact with at the top.

Choosing the wrong tool at any layer creates compounding problems. A weak data pipeline makes great models impossible. Poor MLOps makes great models unreliable. Stack decisions made early are expensive to undo.

This guide covers all 7 layers with honest verdicts from 200+ production deployments — not vendor marketing.

Jump to the Layers ↓
Layer 7
Applications & Interfaces
👥
Layer 6
AI Models & APIs
🧠
Layer 5
ML Platform & Training
🔧
Layer 4
MLOps & Deployment
⚙️
Layer 3
Data Storage & Warehousing
🗄
Layer 2
Data Ingestion & Pipelines
🔄
Layer 1
Cloud Infrastructure
☁️

Every Layer. Honest Verdicts.

Click any layer to explore the tools, trade-offs, and exactly what Sabalynx recommends from real deployments.

☁️
Layer 1 of 7
Cloud Infrastructure

The foundation everything else sits on. Your cloud provider determines GPU availability, regional compliance, cost structure, and how well every other tool integrates. This is the hardest decision to reverse — choose it deliberately.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)✓ Our Pick

The largest cloud ecosystem with the widest ML-specific service catalogue. SageMaker, Bedrock, Rekognition, and a deep partner network make AWS the safest default for most enterprise AI workloads.

🟢 Verdict: Default recommendation for enterprises. Broadest compliance certifications (HIPAA, FedRAMP, SOC 2), the largest certified talent pool globally, and the deepest AI-specific managed services.
SageMakerBedrockS3EC2 GPU
💲 Pay-as-you-go · Enterprise discounts available
Microsoft Azure✓ Our Pick

Best choice for Microsoft-heavy organisations. Azure OpenAI Service gives managed GPT-4 access with enterprise data protection, and the Active Directory / Microsoft 365 integration is unmatched for governance.

🟢 Verdict: First recommendation for any org already on Microsoft 365 or .NET. Azure OpenAI Service is the most enterprise-ready GPT-4 deployment available today.
Azure MLOpenAI ServiceCognitive Services
💲 Pay-as-you-go · Enterprise agreements
Google Cloud (GCP)Consider

Google’s own AI research flows directly into GCP. Vertex AI, TPU access, Gemini API, and BigQuery make it compelling for ML-heavy workloads and analytics-first organisations.

🟡 Verdict: Strong when BigQuery is already your data warehouse or when Gemini’s 1M-token context window is specifically needed. Smaller partner ecosystem than AWS/Azure but growing fast.
Vertex AIBigQueryTPUsGemini API
💲 Pay-as-you-go · Committed use discounts
On-Premise / HybridSpecific Cases

Required for organisations with strict data sovereignty rules — defence, regulated healthcare, certain financial regulators. NVIDIA DGX systems or private OpenShift clusters handle sensitive workloads on-site.

🟡 Verdict: Only recommend when cloud is genuinely impossible. Higher capex, slower iteration. Hybrid (sensitive data on-prem, compute in cloud) is usually the pragmatic middle ground.
NVIDIA DGXOpenShiftHybrid
💲 High capex · Significant engineering overhead
CoreWeave / Lambda LabsGPU Burst

Specialist GPU cloud providers with H100/A100 access at lower cost than hyperscalers. Useful for burst training runs when AWS/GCP GPU capacity is constrained or costs prohibitive.

🟡 Verdict: Good for one-off large training runs. Not a primary cloud — no managed AI services, limited tooling. Use alongside a main hyperscaler.
H100A100GPU Burst
💲 From $2/hr per GPU · No long-term lock-in
✅ Use AWS when
You need the broadest compliance certs (HIPAA, FedRAMP, ISO)
You want the largest talent pool and partner ecosystem
You plan to build on SageMaker or Bedrock for managed AI
Global multi-region deployment is required from day one
✅ Use Azure when
Organisation is already on Microsoft 365 or Active Directory
You need GPT-4 / GPT-4o with enterprise data protection
Existing .NET workloads or SQL Server infrastructure
Strong regulatory audit trail requirements (Azure Policy)
🔄
Layer 2 of 7
Data Ingestion & Pipelines

Getting data from source systems into your AI infrastructure reliably, at scale, and on schedule. Underinvestment here is the single most common reason AI projects fail — no matter how good the model, garbage data in means garbage predictions out.

Apache Airflow✓ Our Pick

Industry-standard workflow orchestrator for data pipelines. Define pipelines as Python DAGs, schedule them, monitor execution, and retry failed tasks automatically. Managed versions on AWS (MWAA), GCP (Cloud Composer), and Astronomer.

🟢 Verdict: Default for complex multi-step pipelines with dependencies. Steep initial learning curve but enormous community, extensive operator library, and battle-tested at every scale.
OrchestrationPython DAGsSchedulingRetry Logic
💲 Open source · Managed from ~$300/mo
dbt (data build tool)✓ Our Pick

Transforms raw data inside your warehouse using SQL with version control, testing, and documentation. Turns ad hoc queries into production-grade data models that reliably feed AI features.

🟢 Verdict: Essential in almost every modern data stack. Any team doing significant SQL transformation work should be using dbt. Dramatically improves data quality and auditability — both critical for AI.
SQL TransformsData ModellingTestingLineage
💲 Open source · dbt Cloud from $100/mo
Apache Kafka✓ Our Pick

Distributed event streaming for real-time data pipelines. When your AI needs to react to events as they happen — fraud alerts, live recommendations, real-time monitoring — Kafka is the backbone.

🟢 Verdict: Indispensable for real-time AI use cases. Overkill for batch-only pipelines. Use via managed Confluent Cloud or AWS MSK to avoid heavy operational overhead.
Real-timeEvent StreamingPub/Sub
💲 Open source · Confluent Cloud from $400/mo
Fivetran / AirbyteConsider

Pre-built connectors that sync data from 300+ sources (Salesforce, Shopify, databases, SaaS APIs) into your warehouse automatically. Fivetran is managed enterprise; Airbyte is open-source self-hosted.

🟡 Verdict: Great for rapidly connecting existing SaaS data sources. Pair with dbt for transformations. Fivetran costs scale quickly — evaluate Airbyte self-hosted for cost-sensitive deployments.
ELT Connectors300+ SourcesManaged
💲 Fivetran from $500/mo · Airbyte open source
AWS Glue / Azure Data FactoryConsider

Fully managed ETL services from major cloud providers. Lower operational overhead than self-managed Airflow, tightly integrated with their respective cloud ecosystems.

🟡 Verdict: Good default when the team is already deep in one cloud and wants minimal infrastructure management. Less flexible than Airflow for complex multi-system pipelines with custom logic.
Managed ETLCloud NativeServerless
💲 Pay-per-use · Typically $200–$2K/mo
✅ Invest heavily here when
Data lives in 5+ source systems that need to be unified
Real-time AI decisions are required (fraud, live recommendations)
Data quality is inconsistent or poorly documented across systems
Regulatory audit trails on data lineage are required
❌ Common mistakes at this layer
Skipping data quality checks — errors compound downstream
No lineage tracking — impossible to audit model decisions
Building custom ETL in notebooks instead of proper pipeline tools
Ignoring schema evolution — source changes break pipelines silently
🗄
Layer 3 of 7
Data Storage & Warehousing

Where your data lives between ingestion and model training or inference. The split between data lake (raw storage) and data warehouse (processed, queryable) is a critical architecture decision. Get this wrong and every query and training run becomes painful.

Snowflake✓ Our Pick

Cloud-native data warehouse with instant scaling, zero-copy data sharing, and deep BI integrations. Snowflake Cortex now adds built-in vector search and LLM functions — reducing stack complexity for AI workloads.

🟢 Verdict: Most-recommended warehouse for enterprises. Best combination of performance, ecosystem, and growing AI-native features. Cortex AI is making Snowflake a genuine ML platform in its own right.
Cloud WarehouseVector SearchCortex AIData Sharing
💲 Credit-based · $2K–$50K/mo at enterprise scale
Databricks Lakehouse✓ Our Pick

Unifies data lake and warehouse into a single lakehouse architecture on Delta Lake. MLflow integration makes it a strong end-to-end ML platform when combined with Unity Catalog for governance.

🟢 Verdict: Best choice when data scientists and ML engineers are the primary users. The unified data + ML environment removes significant integration overhead and is our go-to for ML-heavy organisations.
LakehouseDelta LakeMLflowSpark
💲 DBU-based · Enterprise from $5K+/mo
Google BigQueryConsider

Serverless analytical warehouse with built-in ML functions (BQML) and Vertex AI integration. Exceptional performance on petabyte-scale queries — no infrastructure to manage.

🟡 Verdict: Best for GCP-primary stacks and large analytical workloads. BQML allows SQL-native model training which is powerful for analyst-led teams who don’t want to manage Python environments.
ServerlessBigQuery MLPetabyte Scale
💲 Pay-per-query · Flat-rate from $2K/mo
Pinecone / WeaviateVector DBs

Purpose-built vector databases for storing and searching embeddings. Essential infrastructure for RAG systems, semantic search, and recommendation engines that need fast similarity search at scale.

🟡 Verdict: If building RAG or semantic search, you need a vector DB. Pinecone is the managed leader. Weaviate and Qdrant are strong open-source alternatives. Increasingly, warehouse-native options (Snowflake Cortex) are becoming competitive.
Vector SearchEmbeddingsRAGSemantic Search
💲 Pinecone from $70/mo · Weaviate open source
AWS S3 + AthenaData Lake

S3 as object storage data lake, Athena for serverless SQL queries on top. Simple, cheap, and massively scalable. Best for raw data landing zones before processing — not a replacement for a proper warehouse.

🟡 Verdict: Almost always part of AWS stacks for raw storage. Pair with Glue cataloguing and a proper warehouse (Snowflake/Redshift) for production querying and feature engineering.
Object StorageServerless SQLData Lake
💲 ~$23/TB/mo storage · $5/TB query (Athena)
RedisFeature Store

In-memory data store used as a feature store for low-latency serving of pre-computed ML features at inference time. When a model needs features in under 10ms — real-time fraud, live recommendations — Redis is the answer.

🟡 Verdict: Essential for latency-sensitive real-time inference. Redis Cloud or AWS ElastiCache for managed versions. Not needed for batch ML pipelines where latency is not a concern.
In-MemoryFeature Serving<10ms Latency
💲 Open source · Redis Cloud from $7/mo
⚙️
Layer 4 of 7
MLOps & Deployment

The difference between a model that works in a notebook and one that reliably serves predictions in production at scale. MLOps covers CI/CD for models, experiment tracking, model registry, monitoring, and automated retraining. Most AI projects underinvest here — and quietly pay the price months later.

MLflow✓ Our Pick

Open-source platform for experiment tracking, model registry, and deployment. Log parameters, metrics, and artefacts across every training run. Compare experiments side-by-side. Promote models through staging to production with full lineage.

🟢 Verdict: Default experiment tracker on almost every project. Simple to set up, universal framework support, and the model registry is industry-standard. Integrates natively with Databricks, SageMaker, and Azure ML.
Experiment TrackingModel RegistryOpen Source
💲 Open source · Managed via Databricks
AWS SageMaker✓ Our Pick

Fully managed ML platform covering the full lifecycle: data labelling, training, hyperparameter tuning, model hosting, A/B testing, and drift monitoring — all on AWS. Reduces infrastructure management for teams without dedicated MLOps engineers.

🟢 Verdict: Best managed MLOps platform for AWS-primary stacks. SageMaker Pipelines handles end-to-end orchestration; SageMaker Model Monitor catches drift automatically without building custom tooling.
Managed MLPipelinesModel MonitorA/B Testing
💲 Pay-per-use · Typically $500–$10K/mo
Weights & Biases (W&B)Consider

Premium experiment tracking and model visualisation platform. Best-in-class UI for comparing training runs, visualising metrics across hundreds of experiments, and team collaboration. Popular in deep learning and LLM fine-tuning.

🟡 Verdict: Excellent for teams doing intensive experimentation. Better UI than MLflow. Adds cost and vendor dependency but worth it for teams running hundreds of experiments per week and doing serious fine-tuning work.
Experiment TrackingVisualisationLLM Fine-tuning
💲 Free tier · Teams from $50/user/mo
Evidently AI / ArizeMonitoring

Dedicated ML observability platforms for detecting data drift, model performance degradation, and data quality issues in production. Evidently is open-source; Arize is enterprise-managed with deeper alerting and root-cause analysis.

🟡 Verdict: Every production model needs drift monitoring. Evidently AI is the default where SageMaker Model Monitor is not already in the stack. Don’t ship to production without monitoring — drift is silent and damaging.
Drift DetectionModel MonitoringAlerting
💲 Evidently open source · Arize from $500/mo
Kubernetes + KServeAdvanced

For organisations needing full control over model serving infrastructure. Kubernetes manages containerised model servers; KServe provides standardised inference APIs with auto-scaling, canary deployments, and multi-model serving.

🟡 Verdict: Powerful but operationally heavy. Only recommend when managed alternatives can’t meet latency, cost, or multi-cloud requirements. Requires a dedicated MLOps engineer to run well.
Container OrchestrationModel ServingAuto-scaling
💲 Infrastructure costs + significant engineering overhead
🔧
Layer 5 of 7
ML Platform & Training Frameworks

The core machine learning libraries your data scientists use to build, train, and evaluate models. Framework choice affects performance, iteration speed, hiring, and long-term maintenance. Most mature stacks use multiple frameworks for different use cases.

PyTorch✓ Our Pick

The dominant deep learning framework in both research and production. Dynamic computation graphs, intuitive debugging, and the largest research community. Hugging Face Transformers is built on PyTorch, making LLM fine-tuning straightforward.

🟢 Verdict: Default for all deep learning, LLM fine-tuning, and computer vision. The ecosystem advantage is now decisive — almost every new model architecture ships in PyTorch first.
Deep LearningLLM Fine-tuningComputer Vision
💲 Open source · Free
scikit-learn + XGBoost✓ Our Pick

The gold standard for classical ML on tabular data. scikit-learn covers every traditional algorithm with a consistent API; XGBoost and LightGBM consistently outperform neural networks on structured business data.

🟢 Verdict: Right choice for fraud detection, churn prediction, credit scoring, and any tabular classification/regression task. More interpretable than neural nets, faster to train, and easier to deploy.
Classical MLTabular DataGradient Boosting
💲 Open source · Free
Hugging Face✓ Our Pick

The hub for pre-trained models and the Transformers library. 500,000+ models, straightforward fine-tuning, and Inference Endpoints for managed hosting. Essential for any NLP, LLM, or computer vision work on foundation models.

🟢 Verdict: Used on virtually every LLM and NLP project. The model hub and Transformers library save weeks of work. Inference Endpoints removes the need to build your own serving infrastructure for many use cases.
Pre-trained ModelsFine-tuningNLPTransformers
💲 Open source · Inference Endpoints from $0.06/hr
LangChain / LlamaIndexLLM Apps

Orchestration frameworks for building LLM applications — chains, agents, RAG pipelines, memory systems, and tool use. LangChain is broader; LlamaIndex specialises in retrieval and indexing for RAG.

🟡 Verdict: Excellent for rapid prototyping. Production deployments often need custom implementations for performance and reliability. Use to prove concepts quickly, then evaluate whether the abstraction adds or removes value in production.
LLM OrchestrationRAGAgentsChains
💲 Open source · LangSmith from $39/mo
TensorFlow / KerasConsider

Google’s deep learning framework. Was dominant before PyTorch. Still widely used in production due to better mobile/edge deployment (TFLite) and high-throughput serving via TensorFlow Serving.

🟡 Verdict: Use when deploying to mobile/edge (TFLite) or when client infrastructure is already TF-based. For new deep learning projects, PyTorch is the default — but existing TF codebases don’t need migration.
Deep LearningTFLiteEdge Deployment
💲 Open source · Free
🧠
Layer 6 of 7
AI Models & Foundation APIs

The intelligence layer. Whether you build custom models from scratch, fine-tune open-source foundation models, or call hosted API models, this is where capability meets cost. The right answer depends on data sensitivity, latency, budget, and customisation requirements.

GPT-4o (OpenAI via Azure)✓ Our Pick

State-of-the-art general-purpose LLM with best-in-class reasoning, coding, and instruction following. GPT-4o adds multimodal capabilities (vision + text). Deploy via Azure OpenAI for enterprise data protection and compliance.

🟢 Verdict: Default for complex reasoning, document analysis, and code generation. Enterprise deployments via Azure OpenAI for data residency guarantees. Avoid sending sensitive data to the OpenAI API directly.
General PurposeMultimodalReasoningCode
💲 GPT-4o: ~$5/1M input tokens · ~$15/1M output
Claude (Anthropic)✓ Our Pick

Excels at long-context document analysis (200K token window), nuanced writing, and safety-critical applications. Constitution-based training makes it a strong choice for regulated industries needing predictable, policy-aligned outputs.

🟢 Verdict: Preferred for legal document analysis, compliance use cases, and any application requiring very long context windows. Strong for content generation requiring a consistent, professional voice.
Long ContextDocument AnalysisSafetyLegal
💲 Claude 3.5 Sonnet: ~$3/1M input · ~$15/1M output
Llama 3 / Mistral (Open Source)✓ Our Pick

Open-weight models deployable on your own infrastructure — no data leaves your environment. Llama 3 and Mistral models offer performance approaching GPT-4 on many tasks at a fraction of API cost at scale.

🟢 Verdict: Strongly recommended when data cannot leave the organisation, when API costs at scale are prohibitive, or when domain-specific fine-tuning is needed. Deploy via vLLM or Ollama on GPU instances.
Open WeightsOn-PremiseFine-tunableData Privacy
💲 GPU infrastructure cost only · No per-token API fees
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Google)Consider

Google’s flagship multimodal model with a 1M token context window — the longest available. Strong for video understanding, very long document analysis, and deep GCP stack integration via Vertex AI.

🟡 Verdict: Best for video analysis, very long documents (entire codebases, legal discovery sets), and GCP-native deployments. 1M context window is genuinely differentiated when you actually need that scale.
1M ContextMultimodalVideoGCP Native
💲 ~$3.50/1M input tokens · Vertex AI pricing
Custom Fine-tuned ModelsAdvanced

Fine-tune domain-specific models on your proprietary data using LoRA or QLoRA. Best for consistent tone of voice, domain-specific terminology, and high-volume tasks where general models consistently underperform.

🟡 Verdict: Worth investing in when you have 10K+ high-quality labelled examples and a high-volume repeatable task. Fine-tuning cost amortises quickly at scale. Exhaust prompt engineering first — it is often sufficient.
LoRA / QLoRADomain-SpecificOn-Premise
💲 One-time training cost · Lower inference cost at scale

Model Selection Guide

RequirementBest ModelWhy
Data must not leave orgLlama 3 / Mistral (self-hosted)Full data sovereignty, no third-party API calls
Complex reasoning or codingGPT-4o or Claude 3.5 SonnetBest-in-class on complex, multi-step tasks
Documents over 200K tokensGemini 1.5 Pro or Claude 3.5Largest context windows currently available
High-volume, cost-sensitiveGPT-4o mini / Haiku / open-source10–20x cheaper, sufficient for many production tasks
Domain-specific terminologyFine-tuned open-source modelBetter consistency, lower cost at scale once trained
Video understandingGemini 1.5 ProOnly major model with strong video analysis support
Microsoft ecosystem alreadyGPT-4o via Azure OpenAIEnterprise data protection, compliance guarantees
👥
Layer 7 of 7
Applications & User Interfaces

The layer users actually see and interact with. AI value is only realised when it is embedded in workflows people use every day. This covers dashboards, chatbots, APIs powering downstream systems, and tooling that lets non-technical teams act on AI outputs.

Streamlit✓ Our Pick

Python-native framework for building data apps and AI interfaces in hours, not weeks. Data scientists ship interactive dashboards, model playgrounds, and internal tools without needing a frontend developer.

🟢 Verdict: Default for internal AI tools and proof-of-concept demos. Nothing gets stakeholder buy-in faster than an interactive app. Getting a business user to interact with a live prototype in week one is worth more than any slide deck.
Python AppsDashboardsRapid Prototyping
💲 Open source · Cloud from $250/mo
FastAPI✓ Our Pick

High-performance Python framework for building AI model APIs. Async support, automatic OpenAPI documentation, Pydantic validation, and near-Go performance make it the standard for production AI service endpoints.

🟢 Verdict: Default for exposing model inference as an API. Every production AI service we build uses FastAPI. Pairs with Docker and Kubernetes for containerised, scalable deployment.
REST APIAsyncOpenAPIProduction
💲 Open source · Free
Tableau / Power BIConsider

Enterprise BI platforms increasingly embedding AI features — natural language queries, anomaly highlighting, predictive analytics. Best when AI insights need to live inside dashboards business teams already use daily.

🟡 Verdict: Use when your audience is business users who won’t adopt a new tool. Embedding AI outputs into existing Tableau or Power BI dashboards dramatically increases adoption vs. building a standalone AI interface.
BI DashboardsBusiness UsersAI Embed
💲 Power BI from $10/user/mo · Tableau from $75/user/mo
GradioDemos

Even faster than Streamlit for ML model demos. Three lines of Python to wrap any model with a web interface. Hugging Face Spaces hosts Gradio apps for free. Ideal for stakeholder demos and model evaluation UIs.

🟡 Verdict: Go-to for rapid model demos in the early project phase. Getting stakeholders to interact with a live model in a first meeting changes the entire dynamic of the engagement.
Model DemosHF SpacesRapid UI
💲 Open source · HF Spaces free tier
n8n / Make (AI Workflows)Low-Code

No-code workflow automation platforms with AI nodes for connecting LLM calls, databases, and business apps without engineering overhead. Useful for embedding AI into operational workflows for non-technical teams.

🟡 Verdict: n8n (self-hosted) is a legitimate production tool for automating AI-powered workflows without a full engineering team. Good for connecting AI outputs to CRM, email, Slack, and reporting systems.
No-CodeAI WorkflowsAutomation
💲 n8n open source · Cloud from $24/mo

Three Proven Starting Points

Pick the tier that matches your budget, team size, and AI maturity. Each is a real starting point used on real engagements — not a theoretical ideal.

Starter Stack
MVP & POC
Under $50K budget · Under 50 employees · First AI project
☁️
Cloud: AWS or Azure (free tiers to start)
🔄
Pipelines: Managed Airflow or simple Python scripts
🗄
Storage: S3 + PostgreSQL or SQLite
⚙️
MLOps: MLflow self-hosted
🔧
Training: scikit-learn + XGBoost
🧠
Models: GPT-4o API or Llama open source
👥
Interface: Streamlit or Gradio
Typical monthly cost
$500 – $3K
Scales with usage. Minimal DevOps overhead required.
Scale-Up Stack
Growth & Production
$100K–$500K budget · 50–500 employees
☁️
Cloud: AWS (primary) + multi-region
🔄
Pipelines: Airflow + dbt + Fivetran connectors
🗄
Storage: Snowflake + S3 data lake + Pinecone
⚙️
MLOps: MLflow + SageMaker Pipelines + Evidently
🔧
Training: PyTorch + XGBoost + Hugging Face
🧠
Models: GPT-4o via Azure + fine-tuned Llama
👥
Interface: FastAPI + React frontend + Streamlit internal
Typical monthly cost
$5K – $30K
Requires 1–2 dedicated MLOps or data engineers.
Enterprise Stack
Full Scale
$500K+ budget · 500+ employees · Multiple AI products
☁️
Cloud: Multi-cloud (AWS + Azure) + hybrid on-prem
🔄
Pipelines: Airflow + Kafka streaming + dbt + custom
🗄
Storage: Databricks Lakehouse + Snowflake + Redis
⚙️
MLOps: MLflow + SageMaker + W&B + Arize monitoring
🔧
Training: PyTorch + custom fine-tuned models
🧠
Models: Proprietary fine-tuned + API + open-source mix
👥
Interface: Custom React apps + API gateway + BI embeds
Typical monthly cost
$30K – $200K+
Dedicated platform engineering team. ROI at this scale is substantial.

Stack Questions

Want a stack designed specifically for your situation? We do this in every free consultation.

Get Stack Advice →
Rarely. Most organisations already have cloud infrastructure (Layer 1) and some form of data storage (Layer 3). We typically start from what exists and extend rather than rebuild. A mature data team might already have Airflow, dbt, and Snowflake in place — meaning we jump straight to Layer 5 (ML Platform).
Start with API models (GPT-4o, Claude) for prototyping — faster and no ML expertise required to get going. Move to fine-tuned open-source models when: (1) data cannot leave the organisation, (2) API costs at scale are prohibitive, or (3) a general model consistently underperforms on your specific domain. Most organisations end up with a mix.
Follow your existing infrastructure. Microsoft 365 already in place? Use Azure. No existing cloud preference? AWS is the safest default with the widest ecosystem. GCP if BigQuery is central to your data strategy. Avoid choosing a cloud solely on AI feature headlines — operational and integration costs of switching later are significant.
A starter stack can be operational in 1–2 weeks. A production-grade scale-up stack typically takes 6–12 weeks to configure, test, and document properly. Enterprise stacks with custom infrastructure are 3–6 months. Data pipelines and MLOps take the most time — model training is often the fastest part of the process.
Underinvesting in Layer 2 (data pipelines) and Layer 4 (MLOps). Teams spend months building sophisticated models on shaky data foundations — then wonder why production performance differs from notebooks. And they skip monitoring entirely, only discovering model drift when a business metric drops. Both are avoidable with the right stack from the start.

Want a Stack Designed
for Your Specific Needs?

This guide covers general recommendations. Your free consultation gives you a stack architecture designed around your actual data, team skills, compliance requirements, and budget — with tool selections we would stake our reputation on.

Free, no-obligation Response within 24 hours NDA available on request 200+ stacks built & deployed